IRS Seeks Comments from Government Agencies at Upcoming Public; Forum on Proposals to Advance Tax Preparer Performance Standards
WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service today announced the second in a series of public forums will be held on Wednesday, Sept. 2, in Washington, D.C., and feature a panel of federal and state officials, moderated by IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman.
The panel will include representatives from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) and the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). Representatives from the states of California, Maryland, Oregon and New York will also participate on the panel.
Shulman announced a far-reaching review of paid preparers on June 4 to produce a comprehensive set of recommendations by the end of this year to boost taxpayer compliance and strengthen industry standards.
“This is the next important step in our open dialogue with interested parties in this effort,” Shulman said. “I’m very pleased with the quality of the feedback we’ve received so far. I’m confident these forums will ensure that all ideas are on the table when it’s time to form our recommendations.”
The forum will convene at 9 a.m. ET in the IRS Headquarters at 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20224. Anyone interested in attending should confirm attendance by sending an e-mail message to CL.NPL.Communications@irs.gov.
The first public forum was held on July 30 in Washington, D.C., and featured a panel of consumer groups and another panel of tax professional organizations. A third forum will be held in Chicago on Sept. 30 featuring independent return preparers and software industry representatives.
The IRS issued Notice 2009-60 on July 24 as an added call for public comments to ensure that all interested individuals and entities have the opportunity to contribute ideas.
Written comments must be received by Aug. 31, 2009. They should be submitted to CCPA:LPD:PR (Notice 2009-60), Room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044.
Comments may also be e-mailed to Notice.Comments@irscounsel.treas.gov. Please include “Notice 2009-60” in the subject line of any e-mail messages. More details can be found in the notice.
Related item:
Tax Return Preparer Review
Learn How to Fix Retirement Plan Errors
For example – Eligible compensation is calculated incorrectly, a payroll run misses the employee contribution deferral, or you forget to timely remit participant contributions to the plan administrator.
When errors occur, its important to make sure you understand how to correct the problem by using the Voluntary Correction Program (“VCP”).
Here is a list of the top ten failures found in the VCP program:
1. Failure to amend the plan for tax law changes by the end of the period required by the law.
This results in a plan failing to operate in accordance with the current law because the plan document has not been amended to affect such change. Currently, the most common law changes that employers have failed to amend their plans for are GUST*, the good faith amendments for EGTRRA** and the Final and Temporary regulations under section 401(a)(9).
2. Failure to follow the plan’s definition of compensation for determining contributions.
Usually, certain types of compensation are excluded, such as bonuses, commissions, or overtime, or certain types of compensation are included where they should have been excluded. This failure can result in participants receiving allocations to their accounts that are either greater than or less than the amount they should have received.
3. Failure to include eligible employees in the plan or the failure to exclude ineligible employees from the plan.
This often occurs in a controlled group situation after a merger or acquisition. Where otherwise eligible employees are excluded, the excluded employees don’t receive an allocation of contributions to which they are entitled. Where ineligible employees are included in the plan, the employer has made additional contributions which it did not need to make to the plan.
4. Failure to satisfy plan loan provisions.
Loan failures often result from the plan sponsor’s failure to withhold loan payments. Where a plan fails to collect loan repayments from participants, the loan is considered defaulted and the participant should be taxed on the loan in the year of default.
5. Impermissible in-service withdrawals.
These requests relate to both defined benefit and contribution plans. The law provides that distributions to participants can be made upon certain events or the attainment of a specific age. This failure involves the circumstance where a distribution is made to a participant where the law or plan terms do not permit a distribution.
6. Failure to satisfy IRC 401(a)(9) minimum distribution rules.
The law requires that a participant receive a distribution when they attain a certain age. This failure involves the plan not making distributions to participants where they have attained the age for required distributions under the law. The law requires that the participant pay an excise tax of 50% on the amount of required distribution if it is not made timely. The Service will, in appropriate cases, waive the excise tax if the plan sponsor requests the waiver in appropriate situations.
7. Employer eligibility failure.
This occurs when an employer adopts a plan that it legally is not permitted to adopt. Common situations are where a government adopts a 401(k) plan or a tax-exempt entity (other than a 501(c)(3) entity or a public educational organization) adopts a 403(b) plan.
8. Failure to pass the ADP/ACP nondiscrimination tests under IRC 401(k) and 401(m).
This failure could result from the employer not using the correct compensation or where the employer excluded eligible employees who elected not to participate in the 401(k) plan.
9. Failure to properly provide the minimum top-heavy benefit or contribution under IRC 416 to non-key employees.
The law requires that if the account balances or accrued benefits of key employees (typically, owners) comprises a substantial portion of the assets of the plan (generally, 60% of plan assets), non-key employees are entitled to receive a minimum benefit or contribution.
10. Failure to satisfy the limits of IRC 415.
Once you have identified an error, you can refer to the following “Fix-It Guides” published by the IRS.
SARSEP Fix-It Guide(User-friendly version is available.)
SEP Fix-It Guide(User-friendly version is available.)
SIMPLE IRA Plan Fix-It Guide(User-friendly version is available.)

